🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, but block by block. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary since they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but came two big batches of ballots added later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where election day turned out kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani gained 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump previously went for the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured we might exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over half. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he does so afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That really was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I think there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. So there existed some opposition. But no, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.