🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women joined an organized professional network test recently after popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content appear to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."