As a Committed Free-Market Advocate, Yet Universal Medicare Is the Optimal Solution for US Health System

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It's Costly

According to recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you compare it to what average American pays. I can name dozens of businesses that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When you add these expenses versus our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of federal military, technology, social programs and transportation services, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with the current system which require them to decipher the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' medical records for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a better and less expensive strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect amid current situation is that we take a hard look in the mirror and agree that major reforms are necessary.

Jack Newman
Jack Newman

Elara is a seasoned sports analyst with over a decade of experience in betting strategies and odds analysis.